Legal Opinion

Salazar v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 29, 1993No. F-88-569Published

1Opinion of the Court

852 P.2d 729 (1993)

Maximo Lee SALAZAR, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-88-569.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 29, 1993.

Rehearing Denied August 30, 1993.

Barry Benefield, Oklahoma City, William H. Luker, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Norman, for appellant.

Robert Schulte, Dist. Atty., Roy M. Calvert, Asst. Dist. Atty., Lawton, Robert H. Henry, Atty. Gen., A. Diane Hammons, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

CHAPEL, Judge:

Maximo Lee Salazar, appellant, was tried by jury and convicted of the crimes of First Degree Murder (21 O.S.Supp. 1982, §…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lumpkin; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lumpkin.

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API