United States v. Manzano
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Leticia Manzano, proceeding without benefit of counsel, appeals the provisional sentence imposed by the district court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4244(d). This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Manzano pleaded guilty to threatening a witness, victim, or informant in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(3). The district court accepted the guilty plea and ordered Manzano to undergo mental health counseling and a psychological…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. PhibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Philip PrescottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Thomas Lindley RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Abou-KassemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. HollonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012