Legal Opinion

United States v. Manzano

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 17, 2004No. 03-6026PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Leticia Manzano, proceeding without benefit of counsel, appeals the provisional sentence imposed by the district court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4244(d). This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Manzano pleaded guilty to threatening a witness, victim, or informant in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(3). The district court accepted the guilty plea and ordered Manzano to undergo mental health counseling and a psychological…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. PhibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Philip PrescottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Thomas Lindley RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Abou-KassemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HollonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API