Legal Opinion

Romano v. Bono

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHooley, J.

The court finds that there was a partnership as alleged in the complaint. However, it appears that the plaintiff is faced with an insuperable barrier which precludes recovery. This barrier is the illegality which taints the agreement upon which the action is brought.

The Alcoholic Beverage Control Law forbids secret partnerships and requires licenses to be issued in the name of the true owner of the business. Since the agreement alleged by the plaintiff contemplated that the true owners of the business were to remain and did remain concealed and that a “ dummy ” was to act and did act for them…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Morgan Munitions Supply Co. v. Studebaker Corporation of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Sturm v. TrubyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rutkin v. ReinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Rutkin v. ReinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. O'Connor v. O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Courtney v. RiordanNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Bossom Dairy Co. v. Rockdale Creamery Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API