Legal Opinion
Walker v. Motricity Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 19, 2009No. C 09-01316 MHPPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Re: Plaintiffs Motion to Remand
MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Camellia Walker, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, brought suit against defendant Motricity, Inc. (“Motricity”) in the Superior Court of California for the County of Aameda. Motricity removed the action to the Northern District of California. This court granted Walker’s motion to remand the action back to state court on the basis that Motricity failed to show a sufficient amount in controversy to establish federal jurisdiction. Fifteen days later, Motricity again removed the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Richard M. Sanchez v. Monumental Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Overland Direct, Inc. v. Houshang AframianDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Overland Direct, Inc. v. Houshang AframianDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023