Legal Opinion
United States v. J. E. Mamiye & Sons Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided November 19, 1981No. Appeal No. 81-6; C.D. 4878PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nies, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the U.S. Customs Court,1 85 Cust. Ct. 92, C.D. 4878, 509 F. Supp. 1268 (1980), holding certain “tote bags” to be properly classifiable as “handbags” under item 706.24, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS),2 and not as textile articles not specially provided for under item 389.60 (now 389.62), TSUS,3 as claimed here by appellant. We affirm.
*19 Facts
The subject bags consist of various styles of textiles fabric bags, referred to as “totes” or “tote bags,” entered under 20 separate entries. During trial, the parties stipulated that Exhibits…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. A. Johnson & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Joleo Impex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Adolco Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- J. E. Mamiye & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Goodman Manufacturing, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Association, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Regular Common Carrier Conference, Inc., American Trucking Associations, Inc., Eastern Central Motor Carriers Association, Inc., Interstate Carriers Conference, Groendyke Transport, Inc., Intervenors. Household Goods Carriers' Bureau, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Groendyke Transport, Inc., Intervenor. The Eastern Central Motor Carriers Association, Inc. And the Regular Common Carrier Conference, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., International Transport, Inc., Refrigerated International Cargo Haulers, Inc., Groendyke Transport, Inc., Youngblood Transportation Systems, Inc., Coastal Tank Lines, Inc., Central Transport, Inc., Fresh Express, Inc., Allstate Carriers, Inc., Schneider Transport, Inc., Dsi Transports, Inc., Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Association, Inc., J.R.S. Leasing Charter, Inc., L.R.C. Truck Lines, Inc., Carnaco Transport, Inc., Riverside Transportation, Inc., Quality Operations, Inc., R.B.C. Transportation, Inc., Southern Motor Carrier Rate Conference, Clearfield Transportation Company, Inc., Miller Transporters, Inc., Allied Van Lines, Inc., Intervenors. The Eastern Central Motor Carriers Association, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Torres v. McDermott Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Solvay Fluorides, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.