Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
This appeal consolidates four petitions to set aside, in whole or in part, orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission exempting motor contract carriers of property from the Motor Carrier Act’s requirements to file tariffs. We uphold the Commission’s statutory authority to relieve motor contract carriers from the tariff-filing requirements. We also find reasonable the Commission’s use of that authority to exempt all such carriers of property. Because we affirm the Commission’s decision to exempt all such carriers, we do not separately examine the Commission’s orders…
3Cases cited50 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by48 opinions
- Atlantis Express, Inc. v. Standard Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Public Citizen v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Regular Common Carrier Conference v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Hotel and Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25 v. William French Smith, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25 v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.