Legal Opinion

Marth v. Lambert

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1939No. Docket No. 63, Calendar No. 40,468PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I am not in accord with the opinion of Mr. Justice BUTZEL. Citation of authority is unnecessary to establish the rule that on appeal from a judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of the defendant, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Under the application of the above rule we find that the accident happened about 1:30 a. m., on June 9, 1937, on a highway known as US-23. The highway at the scene of the accident consisted of three lanes, each lane being 11 feet wide. Plaintiff was traveling north; and at a point about one mile south of the scene of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Harker v. BushouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Bowmaster v. William H. DePree Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Lawrence v. Bartling & Dull Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Pearce v. RodellMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wallace v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Paquette v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Samuelson v. Olson Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Vaas v. SchrotenboerMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Greenberg v. GreenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API