Legal Opinion · Dissent

Adams v. Department of Law Enforcement

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1978No. 12248Published

1DissentDonaldson, Justice

From the majority’s affirmance of our state liquor licensing system, I must again respectfully dissent. As I stated six years ago in my dissent in State v. Cantrell, 94 Idaho 653, 496 P.2d 276 (1972), the classification system contained in I.C. § 23-903 and I.C. § 23-948 violates the equal protection clauses of the United States and Idaho Constitutions. U.S.Const. amend. XIV; Idaho Const, art. 1, § 13.

Equal protection of the laws is something more than an abstract right. It is a command which the State must respect, the benefits of which every person may demand. Not the least merit of our…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Hill v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. City of Miami v. KayfetzSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Glicker v. Michigan Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API