Legal Opinion
Starishevsky v. Hofstra University
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alan D. Oshrin, J.
With the recognition of the need to eliminate sexual harassment has come an awareness of how difficult the task will be (Harris v Forklift Sys., — US —, 114 S Ct 367 [1993], concurring opn Scalia, J.). The process of eliminating sexual harassment must go forward with recognition of the rights of all involved and without the creation of new wrongs. The process must be propelled by a sense of fairness and not motivated by any other less appropriate notions. Apparently Hofstra University (hereinafter Hofstra) ignored these precepts when considering the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cooper v. Gustavus Adolphus CollegeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Starishevsky v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Sunset Park Redevelopment Committee, Inc. v. Bowery Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- PENA v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOL CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019