Legal Opinion

Nash v. Elizabeth City Hospital Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 22, 1920PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Civil actioe, beard, on demurrer to the complaint, before Bond, J., at August Term, 1920, of Pasquotane. There was judgment overruling the demurrer, and defendant excepted and appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.

The action is instituted by plaintiffs, two of the minority stockholders of defendant corporation in behalf of themselves and such other stockholders as may desire to make themselves parties, and after definite averment of demand and refusal on the part of the corporation to bring suit, the complaint in effect alleges: That the defendant corporation having offered its principal property for sale at public auction in Elizabeth City, the same was bid off by the codefendant, Dr. John Saliba, at $5,700, a grossly inadequate price, and a deed made to him by the company, which he now holds. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mottu v. Davis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Davis v. Keen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Den Ex Dem. Smith v. GreenleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1829
  4. Ruis v. BranchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  5. Henderson-Snyder Co. v. . PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Colt v. . KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. J. B. Colt Co. v. KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Hoggard v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company v. ForbesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API