Legal Opinion

Peneguy v. Porteous

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 2002No. 2001-CA-1503PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

11 TERRI F. LOVE, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Mark E. Peneguy, et al., are the heirs of Edward and Mary J. Wisner and the beneficiaries of 40% of the Edward Wisner Donation (‘Wisner Donation”). Defendants-appellees, William A. Porteous, III, et al., are the heirs of the attorneys who represented Edward’s wife, Mary Wisner, and his two daughters in a 1928 lawsuit to set aside the donation.

On August 4, 1914r Edward Wisner donated to the City of New Orleans in trust certain lands located in Lafourche, Jefferson, and St. John the Baptist Parishes for the benefit of numerous charities. On March…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Starns v. EmmonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. McClung v. Atlas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  4. Succession of CarbajalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  5. Landry v. BLAISE, INCORPORATEDLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. N. Clark, L.L.C. v. ChisesiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Dugas v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. St. Pierre v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Lott v. Mahalia Jackson Residual Family Corp. XYZ Shareholders & XYZ DirectorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Lindy Development, L.L.C. v. DeganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API