Williamson v. First National Bank of Williamson

Litz, Judge,

(concurring) :

In view of the vigorous dissent of Judge Hatcher, who wrote the opinion, the position of the court should be more fully stated.

As the Court of Appeals of Kentucky said, in Daniels v. Banister, 146 Ky. 48, 141 S. W. 393, “This is not a case where the husband took advantage of the youth and inexperience of a woman whom he intended to marry, concealed the character and. kind of his property, and persuaded her to enter into a contract whereby she relinquished all claims to his property in consideration of an insignificant settlement upon her.” In the language of the…