Legal Opinion
DeCarlo & Doll, Inc. v. Dilozir
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 8, 1997No. AC 15568PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVER Y, J.
The plaintiff, DeCarlo and Doll, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court for the defendant, Terry M. Dilozir, in a breach of a contract action. On appeal, the plaintiff contends that the trial court improperly found the contract ambiguous and therefore determined that a subsequent letter between the parties was a contractual amendment. This determination by the trial court permitted the defendant to prevail on a special defense that alleged that the defendant’s payment obligations under the contract were conditioned on the defendant’s seeming financing from a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Northern Indiana Public Service Company, an Indiana Corporation v. Carbon County Coal Company, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. EI Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Dills v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- United States v. Wegematic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- A. J. Wolfe Co. v. Baltimore Contractors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mortenson v. ScheerWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Grass v. GrassConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Lavelle v. Ecoair Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- New London County Mutual Insurance Co. v. ZachemConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Suntech of Connecticut, Inc. v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.