Legal Opinion
Izzillo v. Mulkor Warehousing Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 24, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames S. Brown, J.
Plaintiffs seek an order for leave to serve an amended complaint in this action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained on defendants’ premises.
The facts briefly stated are: That plantiffs were members of the Fire Department of the City of New York on January 15, 1954 and were injured while putting out a fire; that suit was instituted by a prior attorney; that when the case appeared on the calendar, it was marked “ Off ” for failure to file a Statement of Readiness; thereafter present counsel for plaintiffs was retained, who in the course of his examination of the papers…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McConnell v. Caribbean Petroleum Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Gannon v. Royal Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Payne v. New York, Susquehanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carroll v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Burigo v. Di Leo, New York County Courts1963
- McAvoy v. Di Leo, New York County Courts1963
- Panto v. J & M Salvage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990