Legal Opinion
McAvoy v. Di Leo
New York County Courts
Decided July 15, 1963PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John H. Galloway, Jr., J.
This is a motion by the defendants in each of these actions for an order dismissing the second cause of action in the amended complaints on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that they do not state facts sufficient to constitute causes of action.
*47In prior decisions on plaintiffs’ motions to amend their respective complaints to plead a second cause of action under section 205-a of the General Municipal Law, this court indicated that in its opinion the legislative intendment in enacting that section was to impose liability under the circumstances presented…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gannon v. Royal Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Cohen v. DanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Sicolo v. Prudential Savings BankNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Cramer v. NuccitelliNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Burigo v. Di Leo, New York County Courts1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kenavan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Gerhart v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Ruotolo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1991
- Donovan v. Rapid Ray's Printing & Copying, Inc.Buffalo City Court · 1978
- Traver v. City of Saratoga SpringsNew York Supreme Court · 1983