Legal Opinion
State v. Curiel
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 25, 1981No. 1 CA-CR 4692, 1 CA-CR 4747PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Judge.
The major issues presented by this consolidated appeal are whether a plastic eannis-ter falls within the prohibition against war-rantless searches afforded luggage and whether a severance of a co-defendant’s trial should occur where there exist charges against one defendant that do not exist against another defendant.
Defendants Elizabeth Curiel and Rigoberto Curiel were both charged with possession of heroin for sale with a value greater than $250.00, a class 2 felony, in violation of A.R.S. § 36-1002.01, transportation of heroin having a value greater than $250.00, a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. RoscoeArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ComerArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. KinkadeArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. PereaArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. PoehneltCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.