Legal Opinion

State v. Poehnelt

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 7, 1985No. 2 CA-CR 2860PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Presiding Judge.

Appellants were jointly tried to a jury and convicted of intentional or knowing child abuse under A.R.S. § 13-3623(B)(1) (under circumstances likely to produce death or serious physical injury). At sentencing, the court found neither aggravating nor mitigating circumstances and sentenced both to 10.5 years’ imprisonment, the presumptive term for a class 2 felony enhanced because of the dangerous nature. Appellants bring consolidated appeals. Frank Poehnelt, whose appeal we consider first, raises three issues for our consideration. Barbara raises 20 issues. We affirm…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew PayneArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. TrostleArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. Alejandro v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API