Legal Opinion
Cnf Constructors, Incorporated v. Donohoe Construction Company, a Division of the Donohoe Companies, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 13, 1995No. 94-1609PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published per curiam opinion.
OPINION
2Per curiam
Donohoe Construction Company (Donohoe) appeals from a district court ruling that arbitration of a construction contract dispute between Donohoe and CNF Constructors, Inc., (CNF), must take place pursuant to the rules and procedures of the American Arbitration Association (AAA). For the reasons that follow, we conclude that Donohoe’s motion for clarification, upon which the district court ruled and Donohoe appeals, is best characterized as a motion for reconsideration of a final judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Although we express a number of…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Michael Paul HouserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Meral Smith v. Melvin H. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Michael D. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- In Re John Rodgers BurnleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Werner v. CarboCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by97 opinions
- American Canoe Ass'n v. Murphy Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Cummings v. BahrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- MLC AUTOMOTIVE, LLC v. Town of Southern PinesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Powderidge Unit Owners Ass'n v. Highland Properties, Ltd.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- Rezzonico v. H & R Block, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.