State v. Hogg
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
Appellant Daniel V. Hogg was convicted of the unlawful burning of a building. We affirm.
He initially challenges the constitutionality of S. C. Code § 16-11-120 asserting he was deprived of his right as a property owner to dispose of and control his own property. Appellant lacks standing to challenge the statute as he held no property interest in the building that was destroyed. See: Warth v. Seldin, 422 U. S. 490, 95 S. Ct. 2197, 45 L. Ed. (2d) 343 (1975); Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U. S. 128, 99 S. Ct. 421, 58 L. Ed. (2d) 387 (1978).
*228On April 12, 1977, the Hill Top Club was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Francis v. MauldinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- State v. VermillionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. NIX & QUARLESCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986