Legal Opinion

United States v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 5, 2004No. CV04-857 GAF(JTLX)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(1)

FEESS, District Judge.

I

INTRODUCTION

The defendants named in this suit, 26 hospitals and their corporate owners, pro vide healthcare to thousands of patients, including many who are entitled to Medicare coverage for at least a portion of their treatment. To obtain Medicare reimbursement for the treatment of such patients, medical providers, like the defendant hospitals, must submit to the government a claim to which they assign codes that determine the fee the government will pay for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Lahey Clinic Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. State of Fla., Office of Atty. v. Tenet HealthcareDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
  3. United States v. SeibertDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2005
  4. Jerry Cox v. Mariposa CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. P. ex rel. Gov. Employees Ins. Co. v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API