Legal Opinion

Stark v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 3, 1917No. 8765PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action to enforce specific performance of a contract for the sale of property purported to have been executed by a real estate broker under authority from the owner. Judgment of dismissal. Error to the District Court of .Park County, Hon. John H. Denison, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garrigues

STATEMENT.

Stark brought this action as plaintiff against Rogers as defendant in the court below to enforce specific performance of a contract to convey certain real estate and personal property. The contract is signed by A. L. Patton as agent for the owner, and the controversy turns on whether Patton was authorized in writing to enter into a contract binding Rogers to convey the title. Rogers owned the “63” ranch with water rights near Hartzell in Park county, together with one thousand head of branded cattle, more or less, harness, saddles, wagons, farm implements, household furniture,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buckingham v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Johnson v. LennoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  3. Springer v. City Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ellis Canning Company v. BernsteinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1972
  2. Landskroener v. HenningMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Nunnally v. HildermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  4. Spurlock v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API