Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Richards

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 29, 1956No. 39,862PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

The basic question in this case is whether confinement of a defendant in the state penitentiary for a term less than life tolls a statute of limitation in favor of a plaintiff during the period of such confinement. Stated another way, the question is — may a defendant be sued while so confined? ■

For reasons which will hereinafter appear, we hold that such confinement of a defendant does not toll a statute of limitation in favor of a plaintiff — in other words, a defendant so confined may be sued.

On January 20, 1949, the Hartford Accident and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Orozem v. McNeillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  2. Bradley v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  3. Board of Commissioners v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Everly v. ByrdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  5. Grasser v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. AbagnaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API