Legal Opinion

Futch v. Horseshoe Casino

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 2014No. 49,144-WCAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

| horseshoe Casino appeals a judgment that awarded the claimant, Shellie Futch, supplemental earnings benefits (“SEB”), with a penalty and attorney fee in this workers’ compensation claim arising from a January 2004 accident. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Factual Background

Ms. Futch was employed as a dealer at Horseshoe, at an average weekly wage of $800 and a comp rate of $429 a week. On January 17, 2004, she was entering the casino through the tunnel when she tripped on an industrial mat that had wrinkled on the floor. She did not fall but stumbled forward, twisting her right foot.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  3. Daigle v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  4. Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  5. Dean v. Southmark Const.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harris v. City of BastropLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Jackson v. Aramark Healthcare Servs.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Marshall v. Town of WinnsboroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Royals v. Town of RichwoodLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College v. Allen BickhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API