Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Aramark Healthcare Servs.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 2018No. 17–503PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAUNDERS, Judge.

In this case, we must decide whether the Employee's disputed claim for the rate of workers' compensation benefits paid was incorrect. We must also decide whether Employer improperly suspended Employee's medical and indemnity benefits, and if so, whether Employee is entitled to penalties, attorney fees, and legal interest.

Employee alleges that she suffered injuries to her head, neck, right shoulder, right arm and hand, and back as the result of a work-related accident. Following the accident, Employer initially paid Employee indemnity and medical benefits. However, Employee's…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  3. Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  4. Leake v. ParsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chanse Ceasar v. Flexforce Employment Professionals,inc.& Zurich American Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
  2. Silton Ardoin v. Gde Renovations, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API