Legal Opinion
Sniffin v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided April 21, 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
These consolidated appeals have arisen as a result of a remand order by the Housing Court of the City of Boston to the Boston rent control administration (board) for reconsideration of a rent adjustment in light of our decision in Niles v. Boston Rent Control Admr., 6 Mass. App. Ct. 135 (1978), and because of certain other rulings made by the Housing Court. The Prudential Insurance Company of America (Prudential or landlord) not only challenges the correctness of the remand but also the process employed by the board. In the companion case, the tenants claim error in the Housing Court’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- Market Street Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Castro v. BeecherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Salvas v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Berry v. Town of DanversMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
- Gammella v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Sniffin v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Dean v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.