Legal Opinion

Kilgour v. Crawford

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1869PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Whiteside county; the Hon. Wm. W. Heaton, Judge, presiding. The facts in this ease are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lawrence

This was a proceeding in partition, commenced "by John B. Crawford, and Haney, his wife, against William M. Kilgour, Mary J. Kilgour and Elizabeth • Gr. Kilgour, for the purpose of dividing forty acres of land.

' The pleadings and proofs show that the complainant, Haney Crawford, was entitled to one-fourth, the defendant William M. Kilgour, to one-fourth, and the defendant Elizabeth Gr. G-ilgour, to one-half, the land having descended from one Ezekiel J. Kilgour, who was a son of said Elizabeth, and brother of said Haney and William. The. commissioners reported the land incapable of division,…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. McMullen v. ReynoldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Cowdrey v. HitchcockIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. KinsleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Oliver v. LansingNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Noll v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1930

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API