Kilgour v. Crawford
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Whiteside county; the Hon. Wm. W. Heaton, Judge, presiding. The facts in this ease are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lawrence
This was a proceeding in partition, commenced "by John B. Crawford, and Haney, his wife, against William M. Kilgour, Mary J. Kilgour and Elizabeth • Gr. Kilgour, for the purpose of dividing forty acres of land.
' The pleadings and proofs show that the complainant, Haney Crawford, was entitled to one-fourth, the defendant William M. Kilgour, to one-fourth, and the defendant Elizabeth Gr. G-ilgour, to one-half, the land having descended from one Ezekiel J. Kilgour, who was a son of said Elizabeth, and brother of said Haney and William. The. commissioners reported the land incapable of division,…
2Cited by19 opinions
- McMullen v. ReynoldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Cowdrey v. HitchcockIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. KinsleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- Oliver v. LansingNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Noll v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.