Ciba Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, Judge:
The merchandise at bar, invoiced as “2-Benzyl-4: 5-Imidazoline HydRochloeide,” was classified at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem and 7 cents per pound under paragraph 28 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as a coal-tar medicinal.
Plaintiff claims the merchandise should be classified under paragraph 5 of the Tariff Act of 1930 at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem as a “medicinal preparation, not specially provided for,” or, alternatively, under paragraph 34 of the said act, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, at the rate of 5 per centum ad…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Overton & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- California Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co. W. J. Matheson & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891
- In re Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
- Magnus v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961