Legal Opinion

State v. Guyette

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 1, 2010No. 070632941; A139806Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him of a number of crimes. In his sole assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in imposing an upward departure sentence on his conviction for second-degree kidnapping. Pursuant to ORS 136.765, the state provided notice of its intent to rely on enhancement facts to increase defendant’s sentence. 1 However, defendant asserts that the “trial court lacked the authority to impose a departure sentence because the state did not file notice of intent to rely on enhancement facts at sentencing with the court.” (Boldface omitted;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API