Lovell v. Rowan Mutual Fire Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Chief Judge.
This case presents a question of first impression in this State; i.e. whether an innocent wife can recover under an insurance policy issued to her husband insuring property owned by them as tenants by the entirety when the loss by fire was occasioned by the intentional burning of the property by the husband. The answer must be governed by the application of the law relating to tenancies by the entirety as well as the provisions of the policy of insurance.
The properties and incidents of this peculiar estate of husband and wife were concisely set out in Davis v. Bass, 188…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vasilion v. VasilionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Mele v. All-Star Ins. Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Rockingham Mutual Insurance v. HummelSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
- Klemens v. Badger Mutual Insurance Co. of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. MolloyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Concepts, Inc. v. First Security Realty Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
- Error v. Western Home Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Error v. Western Home Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- In re FortescueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.