Legal Opinion
(PC) Hepner v. County of Tulare
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 3, 2022No. 1:18-cv-00774Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROGER HEPNER, Case No. 1:18-cv-00774-DAD-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 14 FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COUNTY OF TULARE, et al., COMPLAINT 15 Defendants. 16 (ECF No. 45) __________________________________ 17 NICHOLAS O’NEAL, 18 Cross-Claimant, 19 v. 20 COUNTY OF TULARE, et al., 21 22 Cross-Defendants. 23 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Roger Hepner’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for 24 leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 45.) The motion is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Hiram WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Marilyn Miller v. Rykoff-Sexton, Inc., and Atlas Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.