Cook v. Cook
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
The plaintiffs in this suit in equity are the administrators de bonis non with the will annexed of the estate of Arthur Doane Cook. They seek to have certain offices of the defendant corporation declared vacant, to have return made of money paid as salaries, to prevent the individual defendants from receiving excessive amounts as salaries, (as to which, see Bacon v. Bacon, 266 Mass. 462, 474,) and, in the event of the disagreement of the parties on the election of directors of the defendant corporation, to have a receiver appointed.
The case was referred to a master. On the.return of his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miner v. Belle Isle Ice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Folger v. Columbian InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Fillebrown v. HaywardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Richardson v. Clinton Wall Trunk Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Lyndeborough Glass Co. v. Massachusetts Glass Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Anderson v. BeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Shaw v. HardingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Sagalyn v. Meekins, Packard & Wheat Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Black v. Parker Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Hurley v. Boston Railroad Holding Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.