Legal Opinion

In re Cohen

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided January 10, 1907No. 2,537PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On motion to confirm composition offered by bankrupts.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

„No question is raised in relation to the regularity of the offer of composition. The single point urged by an objecting unsecured creditor is that Cohen, one of the firm of bankrupts, at the examination before the referee, testified falsely and with fraudulent intent and accordingly, the offer of compromise should be rejected by the court. The trustees herein are in favor of the acceptance of the offer, and the referee in bankruptcy has reported' to this court that although the bankrupt Cohen made a false oath in the proceeding, in that he denied making a statement of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re GaylordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
  2. City of Chicago v. Le MoyneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
  3. In re GaylordDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re AgnewDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1915
  2. In re StaffordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1915
  3. In re RivkinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API