Legal Opinion

In re Gaylord

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 6, 1901No. 67PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

WARRACE, Circuit Judge.

If the bankrupt, in his examination at the first meeting of creditors, intentionally testified falsely respecting a material fact, we do not doubt that his perjury constituted a valid objection to his discharge, and that his discharge should have been refused. Section 7 of the bankrupt act provides that no testimony given by the bankrupt at any meeting of creditors “shall be offered in evidence against him in any criminal proceeding.” The proceeding for a discharge is not a criminal proceeding, and the section has no apparent application to it. His right to a discharge…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re MarxDistrict Court, D. Kentucky · 1900

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re SlocumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. Wechsler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  3. Troeder v. LorschCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906
  4. In re LeslieDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1903
  5. Hartsfield Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API