Legal Opinion

Ravn v. Planz

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1918No. Civ. No. 2418PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the action because not brought to trial within five years after the defendant filed his answer.

Section 583 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that an action “shall be dismissed ... on motion of the defendant, after due notice to plaintiff or by the court on its own motion, unless such action is brought to trial within five years after the defendant has filed his answer, except where the parties have stipulated in writing that the time may be extended.” This action was not brought to trial within the designated time, and it is not claimed that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Romero v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Larkin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Mazitelli v. CraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Woley v. TurkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Andersen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Moore & HarrahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Hunt v. United Artists Studio Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API