Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ontario Sewing MacHine Co., Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 25, 2001No. A01A0837PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eldridge, Judge.

This is an appeal from the grant of summary judgment to the manufacturer-seller in a fact-intensive product liability case based upon proximate cause involving the post-sale warnings, i.e., a mop assembly machine that had a cutter blade activated without the controls being activated by the plaintiff. The plaintiff, Regina Smith, was injured after the post-sale notice was sent by Ontario Sewing Machine Company, Ltd. to her employer, Wilen’s Mop Manufacturing; the notice only warned the employer to stop using the machinery and to purchase a more expensive newer model to avoid…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. BalentineTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Banks v. ICI Americas, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Williams v. GrierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. ONTARIO SEWING MACHINE COMPANY, LTD. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Hunter v. Werner Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Carolina Industrial Products, Inc. v. Learjet, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API