Legal Opinion

Hancock v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jane S. Solomon, J.

Defendants in this wrongful death action move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff seeks leave to amend the notice of claim she filed with the defendant City of New York (City), and to amend her complaint to allege gross negligence by the defendant A & P Burglar Alarm Systems, Inc. (A & P). For the reasons stated below, the motion for summary judgment by A & P is granted, and the City’s motion is denied. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint is denied and her motion to amend the notice of claim is granted.

BACKGROUND

Before…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. De Long v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Noseworthy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Kalisch-Jarcho, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hancock v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Muthukumarana v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Muthukumarana v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API