Legal Opinion

Hancock v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 1, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered January 10, 1995, to the extent that it denied the motion by defendant City of New York for summary judgment and granted plaintiffs motion to amend the notice of claim, reversed, on the law, without costs, plaintiffs motion is denied, and the motion for summary judgment is granted dismissing the complaint against said defendant. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant City of New York dismissing and severing the complaint as against it.

Defendant A&P Burglar Alarm Systems installed in plaintiffs…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Kircher v. City of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Merced v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Hancock v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Nicolosi v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Laratro v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API