Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Stimpson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 2017No. COA17-226Published

1DissentElmore, Judge

I respectfully disagree with the majority's decision to affirm the trial court's denial of defendant's motions to dismiss four of the five counts of conspiracy to commit robbery with a firearm. The State failed to present substantial evidence of multiple agreements between defendant and his co-conspirators as required to prove more than one conspiracy. Applying the four factors from State v. Rozier , 69 N.C. App. 38, 52, 316 S.E.2d 893, 902 (1984), the State only proved that defendant engaged in one conspiracy. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

I. Standard of Review

A trial court's denial of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. State v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. RozierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API