Legal Opinion

In re Schulder

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1923No. 3946PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was found guilty of contempt by the district court of Millard county and adjudged to pay a fine. From that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

Appellant appeared before said court in response to a citation to show cause, at a time fixed, why he should not be punished for contempt. At the time fixed he, with his counsel, appeared. Before any hearing or proceedings were had, objection was made to the taking of any testimony upon the ground, as. stated by counsel for appellant:

“That the court has no jurisdiction at this time to hear or determine or consider this matter, and particularly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. SavinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Lamberson v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Fisher v. McDanielWyoming Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Matter of Application of LapiqueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. In re ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Gardiner v. YorkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  3. In re RobisonUtah Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API