Legal Opinion

Connor v. Pittsburg Railways Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 1912No. Appeal, No. 107PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal, No. 107, April T., 1912, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Allegheny Co., Fourth Term, 1908, No. 932, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Matthew J. Conner v. Pittsburg Railways Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Swearingen, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $500. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was in refusing binding instructions for defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Head, J.,

In reviewing the judgment entered on the verdict by the learned court below the plaintiff has the right to demand of this court that we accept as established every fact favorable to him which is supported by any evidence produced at the trial. There was evidence to support the following facts: The plaintiff, a man about thirty-eight years of age, who had been a school teacher for many years, desired to board a car of the defendant company going east on Penn avenue towards his home, at about eleven o'clock p. m. He, being then on the north side of Penn avenue a few feet west…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Heaver v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Schuchalter v. P. R. T. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Welsh v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. McLoughlin v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Winter v. Mahoning & Shenango Railway & Light Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API