Legal Opinion

Breuninger v. Lightbown

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 2, 1931No. 5180PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Judge.

Defendants below (plaintiffs in error) seek a review of a judgment for the plaintiff below (defendant in error) in the municipal eourt in a suit for commission on the sale of a- house. The ease was tried without a jury.

Defendants contend that the court erred “in ruling that there were before the court sufficient facts in the whole ease upon which could be predicated a finding in favor of the plaintiff.”

At the close of plaintiff’s ease, defendants moved for a finding in their favor, and, to the overruling of this motion, noted an exception. Thereupon defendants introduced…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Ricketts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Concrete Oil Tank Co. v. MenefeeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API