Concrete Oil Tank Co. v. Menefee
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Menefee, defendant in error (plaintiff below), recovered judgment in the municipal court on account of personal injuries alleged to have been incurred by reason of the collapsing of the rigging and equipment of plaintiff in error (defendant below) while being used in attempting to erect a smokestack.
To tlio denial of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s evidence no exception was taken. The defendant then introduced evidence in its own behalf, and did not repeat its motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence. Defendant then requested and was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Van Stone v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- McCabe & Steen Construction Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Western Produce Co. v. FolliardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Hamilton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Johnson v. KupperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949