Legal Opinion

Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. v. Home Investment & Loan Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 9, 1933No. 8 Div. 494PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Plaintiff is a “finance corporation” and engaged in buying automobile papers. Under the provisions of a “master policy” with defendant, it insured for $800 an automobile which had been sold by the Sims Motor Company to one Markham; the note and mortgage for the deferred payment of $895 having been duly transferred to the plaintiff.

The trial court, sitting without a jury, found for the plaintiff on counts 2 and 3, and those assignments (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17) which relate to the introduction of evidence under counts 1 and 4 (thus eliminated 'by this finding), need not be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murphree v. HansonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Commercial Fire Insurance v. Capital City InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Capital City Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. Brent v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Union Ins. Soc. of Canton v. SudduthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. &198tna Ins. Co. v. KoonceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. CampbellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Motors Insurance Corporation v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Massey v. MasseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  5. Massey v. MasseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API