Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. v. Home Investment & Loan Corp.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
Plaintiff is a “finance corporation” and engaged in buying automobile papers. Under the provisions of a “master policy” with defendant, it insured for $800 an automobile which had been sold by the Sims Motor Company to one Markham; the note and mortgage for the deferred payment of $895 having been duly transferred to the plaintiff.
The trial court, sitting without a jury, found for the plaintiff on counts 2 and 3, and those assignments (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17) which relate to the introduction of evidence under counts 1 and 4 (thus eliminated 'by this finding), need not be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murphree v. HansonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Commercial Fire Insurance v. Capital City InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Capital City Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Brent v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Union Ins. Soc. of Canton v. SudduthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- &198tna Ins. Co. v. KoonceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. CampbellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
- Motors Insurance Corporation v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Massey v. MasseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Massey v. MasseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981