ZVI Construction Co. v. Huggard (In re Huggard)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
HENRY J. BOROFF, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court in this dischargeability action is the plaintiffs request to file an amended complaint containing additional factual allegations and new legal theories of relief. Because the deadline for filing objections to the dischargeability of particular debts passed before the proposed amended complaint was filed, the Court must determine whether the amended complaint “relates back” to the date of the original filing and, even if so, whether it would be appropriate to grant leave to amend under the circumstances of this case.
I.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. ASupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Morel v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- John T. O'LOughLin v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- International Bank of Commerce v. Saenz (In re Saenz)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- Matthyssen v. Richardson (In re Richardson)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2014
- In re: Anthony Michael Richardson and Amie Michelle Richardson v. Johannes Matthyssen and Hendrika MatthyssenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2014