Legal Opinion

Robertson & Wilson Scale & Supply Co. v. Richman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. Docket No. 24PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne; Mandell (Henry A.), J. Assumpsit by Robertson & Wilson Scale & Supply Company against Joseph Richman for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Defendant ran a butcher and grocery business in the city of Detroit. Plaintiff was in the butcher supply business and sold him certain fixtures in that line for a new store he expected to soon open. Differences arose over the terms of sale and delivery of the fixtures contracted for and this action was brought by plaintiff in the circuit court of Wayne county to recover for the articles claimed to have been sold to defendant in compliance with their contract of purchase and sale. Plaintiff declared in assumpsit on the common counts. Defendant pleaded the general issue with notice of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Association Research and Development Corporation v. CNA Financial Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Malarkey Asphalt Co. v. WyborneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. Coburn v. GoldbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. May Oil Burner Corp. v. MungerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  5. Burge Ice MacHine Company, an Illinois Corporation v. George J. Weiss, George J. Weiss v. Burge Ice MacHine Company, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API