Legal Opinion

Kron v. Bodmer

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1933No. File No. 6183Published

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. At the close *688of all of the testimony the defendant moved tbe court for a directed verdict in bis favor, which motion was denied and a verdict returned by the jury for the plaintiff. Thereafter the defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, for a new trial. The motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was denied, the motion for a new trial was granted and the defendant appeals from the order denying motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

It is the contention of appellant, first that probable…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Sheff v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Thompson v. Beacon Valley Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  4. Brown v. SelfridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Teass v. City of St. AlbansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API