Legal Opinion

Order of Railway Conductors & Brakemen v. Clinchfield Railroad

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided November 10, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 2100PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

The jurisdiction of this Court is sought to be invoked by the plaintiffs-union under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1337 for the purpose of impeaching and contesting an award of an arbitration board of the National Mediation Board, rendered on May 3, 1967, and for a declaratory judgment, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202. At the pretrial conference of August 11, 1967 herein, the Court was of the opinion that there could be a disposition of this action on the bases of proper motions filed by the respective parties. The defendant interposed a motion to dismiss the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Felter v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. McCormick v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  4. Oil Workers International Union, Local No. 463 v. Texoma Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  5. R. F. Rhine v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ARO, Inc. v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1976
  2. Watauga Rayon Workers Union, Local 2207 v. Beaunit FibersDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1975
  3. Truck Drivers & Helpers Local Union No. 549 v. Grosset & Dunlap, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API