Legal Opinion

Truck Drivers & Helpers Local Union No. 549 v. Grosset & Dunlap, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided September 14, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 2680Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NEESE, District Judge.

This is a removed action, 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b), involving a federal question, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). The plaintiff union seeks the processing of its grievance against the defendant employer under the pertinent terms of a collective bargaining agreement of the parties of February 28, 1967, as supplemented and extended by the written consent of the parties of April 20, 1970. Both parties have moved for a summary judgment, Rules 56(a), (b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The material facts are not in genuine dispute. Rule 56(c), Federal Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Clinchfield Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  4. Order of Railway Conductors & Brakemen v. Clinchfield RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967
  5. Air Engineering Metal Trades Council & Affiliated Unions v. Aro, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API