Truck Drivers & Helpers Local Union No. 549 v. Grosset & Dunlap, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NEESE, District Judge.
This is a removed action, 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b), involving a federal question, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). The plaintiff union seeks the processing of its grievance against the defendant employer under the pertinent terms of a collective bargaining agreement of the parties of February 28, 1967, as supplemented and extended by the written consent of the parties of April 20, 1970. Both parties have moved for a summary judgment, Rules 56(a), (b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The material facts are not in genuine dispute. Rule 56(c), Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Clinchfield Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Order of Railway Conductors & Brakemen v. Clinchfield RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967
- Air Engineering Metal Trades Council & Affiliated Unions v. Aro, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969