Legal Opinion

Salsitz v. Peltz

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 17, 2002No. 99 CIV.2202(LTS)(MHD)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWAIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Norman Salsitz (“Plaintiff’) alleges that defendants Nelson Peltz (“Peltz”), Peter W. May (“May”) and Triare Companies, Inc. (“Triare” or the “Company”) (collectively, “Defendants”) violated the Williams Act, Section 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Section 14(e)”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78t, 78n(e) in connection with Triarc’s March 1999 “Dutch Auction” self-tender solicitation. Plaintiffs claims are asserted pursuant to Section 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Defendants move for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
Western World Insurance Company v. Stack Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
Charles R. Carlton v. Mystic Transportation, Inc., Mystic Bulk Carriers, Inc., and Leonard BaldariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Atlantic Coast Airlines Holdings, Inc. v. Mesa Air Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003