Ameripride Linen & Apparel Services, Inc. v. Eat Well, Inc.

After a trial in the Superior Court on the plaintiffs claims and the defendants’ counterclaims, a jury found for the plaintiff in quantum memit and for the defendants for breach of contract and violation of G. L. c. 93A, § 11. The jury also *64found the plaintiff’s actions wilful or knowing and, pursuant to a special question asking what multiplier is appropriate, answered “2.” Accordingly, the defendants’ c. 93A damages were doubled.2 Attorney’s fees were awarded to the defendants. The plaintiff appeals on numerous grounds, including that there was no violation of c. 93A, but even if the…